Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David Mattin's avatar

Welcome to the Salon; let's talk!

As for my views on all this, I think talk of AI doom is one part of a larger cultural phenomenon right now; one I'm thinking a lot about.

It seems to be that we're ever-more caught, as a culture, between stories of tech-fuelled transcension of all human limits, and stories of collapse. Between people who believe we'll soon be able to command all knowledge, conquer death, become infinite and all-knowing, fly to Mars, and those who believe that we're on the eve of collapse into some form of post-civilisational afterworld.

I want to understand more about what's driving those stories. And where they're leading us. I think that at the root of this 'transcension vs collapse' narrative is a loss of faith in our collective agency; in the ability of all of us to come together and shape our shared future. We're no longer telling ourselves stories about the brighter futures that could come to be if we build them. And in the void left by this loss of faith all we're left with are the transcension narratives of the techno-optimists, and the other side of that coin: the collapse narratives of those who believe tech is going to doom us all.

Expand full comment
T. Eckhardt's avatar

I do also feel there is not enough regulatory oversight here and, even worse, too much profit focus on this topic. This is not any new technology but one that could well be desastrous to the world. And this is not meant in a doomsday reflex. I refer to the problem that has hit the world with social media and all it's dangerous effect we start to only understand the past years. No regulation, no oversight and look at what it has done. Not a lot of good to western democracies!

AI has even greater potential to do harm to our societies and that is well before a singularity event happens and "Skynet" bombs humanity off the planet.

Expand full comment
28 more comments...

No posts